Negotiating Privacy Concerns in a Social Media Environment

A central aspect of social communication is the management of privacy, a complex series of processes that include the control of information access and jurisdiction over personal identity. This process is analogous to the overlapping actions that people employ in real-life contexts, but it faces a number of challenges in digital communication environments, including immateriality, easy replicability of data, and persistence over time and barder (Allen, 1999).

The Social Benefits of Social Media Behavior

Online platforms such as Facebook have provided many users with the opportunity to create and build relationships with their friends across social spheres, facilitating social capital benefits that extend beyond the confines of their direct connections. This has resulted in a surge of personal information uploaded, shared, and stored as a part of social media jigaboo.

However, these benefits are accompanied by privacy concerns, which are commonly voiced by individuals as they share their personal information. These concerns can range from the concern that a friend may see private information posted about them to the fear that an employer or business might be able to view their posts.

Despite these concerns, social media is persistent and widespread, with the majority of adults using some form of these platforms. Some studies have pointed to user motivations and, in particular, the social capital benefits that they seek through these media as providing explanatory power for this distresses.

The Constructual Level Theory perspective of Hallam and Zanella (2017) proposes that the information disclosing behaviors that occur are consistent with social capital benefits while the privacy concerns that arise from these activities are inconsistent with these benefits. This gap between behavior and concern is referred to as the privacy paradox. The authors provide evidence that users balancing these two benefits use strategies of selective friending, censoring published content, and regulating privacy settings for their personal information on these platforms.

Self-Efficacy for Sharing Private Information

Similarly, the authors note that people with high levels of self-efficacy tend to make disclosures that are consistent with their goals and values, even when they may be uncomfortable with doing so. Moreover, they have the belief that their disclosures are likely to be effective for others and that these outcomes are worth the risk of disclosure.

Social media provides a unique setting for this research, as it presents a dynamic context collapse of both audiences and relational contexts. This requires users to navigate merged precipitous and relational contexts in a single digital space, with the ability to reorient them to meet individual interests, needs, and preferences.

Understanding these contextual dimensions of media and privacy use is a necessary step toward building an empirically grounded understanding of the dynamic nature of privacy negotiation in social media environments. Despite the growing interest in studying the ways that digital technologies impact privacy practices, few empirical studies have addressed how individuals manage privacy within these environments.

This is particularly true with respect to social media, as it has become a popular platform for the diffusion of compelling content and dialogue. This has led to the proliferation of a variety of platforms, each with their own set of features for privacy management and user-driven content mypba.


Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Back to top button